A New “Green Revolution” Takes Root
by Joel on September 8th, 2009
It wasn’t long ago developers thought “green” design made sense only in upscale markets, not in the low to moderate income neighborhoods where we at ShoreBank focus. Thankfully, much has changed in the past few years.
When we began planning for our application for a New Markets Tax Credit allocation–a federal tax credit for commercial investments in low income communities–we had numerous discussions internally about how to use the program to promote green projects in Chicago, Detroit, and Cleveland. Eventually, we made the controversial decision to focus exclusively on financing/supporting projects involving green buildings, alternative energy installations, and energy efficiency retrofits. The assumption was that we could use the subsidy provided by the tax credits to incent borrowers to pursue LEED certification or capital intensive but cost effective green technologies and design features. We were convinced that we would have to tussle with potential investees about the requirements and hold fast to our commitments in the face of significant push-back from the project sponsors.
Interestingly, now that we have been awarded a $35 million allocation of the tax credits, we are discovering a vastly different landscape. Our growing pipeline of potential projects consists of a wide array of building types: retail, hotel, mixed-use, industrial, education, and office. Perhaps the only commonality among them is their intent to achieve at least a LEED Silver certification and inclusion of alternative energy systems and technologies. More telling, all of the sponsors were committed to achieving a LEED rating prior to reaching out to us about tapping our New Markets Tax Credits allocation. We did not have to push the developers or even initiate the conversation about choosing to build green. LEED certification was part and parcel of their plans from the outset.
There are a variety of reasons for the decisions to build green. In many cases, doing so is required for other types of public subsidy, such as TIF assistance, Enterprise Zone benefits, or allocations of low income housing tax credits. But reasons extend beyond these governmental requirements. In some cases, the developers believe “green” offers a competitive advantage. In other cases, sustainability is a fundamental component of the developers’ “triple bottom line” objectives. An example of the latter is the redevelopment project planned for a vacant commercial building on Chicago’s southeast side, not far from some of the planned Olympic venues. For the developer, this green project offers a profitable way to promote development in this very needy tract–the tract is under 20% of the area median income and has a poverty rate above 40%, making it one of poorest in the city. Yet, this project is about bringing not only 100 new jobs to this underserved community, but also healthy food options to residents of this food desert through the opening of an organic produce store.
We are pleased to see this progression in the marketplace and excited to help further the green economy by helping these great projects get off the ground (none could move forward without the subsidy provided by these tax credits). With developers more open to green requirements than we expected, we can push further by catalyzing creation of new types of financial modes involving third party ownership of alternative energy systems, being more stringent around energy efficiency requirements (as well as “green” design), and promoting greater opportunity for residents.
Tags: community development, energy efficiency, green banking, green building, ShoreBank, triple bottom line
