Am I the only one who finds it odd that my friend’s condo door doesn’t have a peephole? I do not want to have to look out a side window to identify the solicitor at my door. But, isn’t that exactly how giving through social media feels? Now, don’t get me wrong, I think it is great that the internet has revolutionized and accelerated online giving. The Red Cross has thus far raised over $21 million in $10 text donations for Haiti (and I hope there is more to come!); all nonprofits raised $4 million in the entirety of 2009. But, a reported 4,000 scam sites, disguised as nonprofit relief organizations, arose to take a cut of online donations to Hurricane Katrina. Social media makes it easy to give and hard to identity fakes. With Americans having already donated $150 million online (out of the total $300 million) to Haiti, I don’t want to see this giving trend mitigated by fear of cons. Here are a few social media reminders that will help.
Always check for ID. BBB Wise Giving provides a few tips on verifying online nonprofits. First, look for ID verification, such as a verified badge on Twitter. Second, find out if the nonprofit relief organization has an on-the-ground presence in the impacted areas. Third, find out if the nonprofit relief organization is providing direct aid. Fourth, rely on expert opinions. And, finally, when in doubt, go with the one you know or just give offline.
Beware of geeks bearing gifts. Just because you have been invited to use a Facebook application or have received a link from a friend doesn’t mean you have to open it! More than once I have received an email from a friend that warns not to click any link from previous emails because of its malicious intent. If something looks odd, it is better to get confirmation from your friend that she is the sender rather than to just open the link.
Limit your social networks. Would you invite your 5,000 Facebook friends to a house party? Most likely you would not. The greater your social network, the greater the likelihood that one of your friends or an evil doppelganger could send you a malicious link that could scrape critical logins and passwords or infect your computer with a nasty virus. Know who your friends are and keep them limited to 600.
Lengthen abbreviations. Bit.ly and Tiny URL are fantastic ways to shorten URLs to fit character limitations. But they are also creative solutions to mask malevolent web addresses. Protect yourself by installing an add-on that will display the full URL. When clicking on links, longer is better than shorter.
As we continue to maximize the profoundly good impact that social media creates, to paraphrase the film Home Alone, our social media profiles are our homes, we have to protect them so we can continue to make them safe havens for giving.
Guest Contributor: Stephen Jacob, AVP, Credit Analysis
Haiti is not some far away place to me. Both my parents are from Haiti and I have family members that still live there. I try to go to Haiti every 2 to 3 years and last visited in 2007 to volunteer with a local organization called Concerned Haitian Americans of Illinois (CHAI). I have seen a mix of improving and deteriorating conditions in the country over the past 10 years, but this recent crisis is a wake up call.
Much of the devastation in Haiti was largely unavoidable. Even if the buildings had been constructed better, it is unlikely any well made structures could survive a 7.0 earthquake[1]. Nonetheless, lax building code enforcement and poor construction quality has exacerbated the problem. For example, in 2008 there was a school collapse in Port-au-Prince that had nothing to do with the earthquake. However, some of the lack of communications and access to roads to help disaster victims can be attributed to a very poor and deteriorating infrastructure. The rush to make sure that those in need get emergency medical attention, clean water, and food, should compel us to think about making sustainable improvements to not only prevent future crises but also to create new economic opportunities that improves the quality of life for Haitians.
Immediately after the disaster there will be an opportunity to rebuild – to begin anew—creating the infrastructure designed to sustain a modern country. In recent months, there have been initiatives to reduce the time it takes to incorporate a business. According to the World Bank, it requires 13 procedures, takes 195 days, and costs 227.93% GNI per capita to start a business in Haiti – this is almost unheard of. Across the border in the Dominican Republic, it requires only 8 procedures, takes 19 days, and costs 17.3% GNI per capita to start a business. Along each of the World Bank’s indices of access to business credit and protection of investors, Haiti is in the bottom of the rankings[2]. Haiti is one of the most difficult countries in the world to do business with—this needs to change if there’s ever to be any hope for catalyzing the development that can begin to transform the country and improve peoples’ lives.
In addition, the average Haitian, no different than most, needs to be gainfully employed in order to provide for his or her family and businesses need either debt or savings to get off the ground. But with the unemployment rate hovering around 50% for the last two decades, gainful employment will require greater foreign direct investment and a growing economy. A long-term solution requires investment in both the country’s physical infrastructure (e.g., roads, ports, and telecommunications) and its social infrastructure (e.g., improved school system, reform of a standing army or national police force, and protection of property rights). Without this investment and the ability to provide access to credit, Haiti will continue to be mired in poverty.
Many friends and colleagues have been asking me how to help. In the near term, money is the best thing to send because Haiti is a logistical nightmare, (especially today). And, if you donate, please do your homework to ensure your donation goes to a reputable organization who will put your fiscal aid to good use in Haiti. I am donating to the Concerned Haitian Americans of Illinois, but I am listing a few other very worthwhile organizations for you to consider making a contribution.
[1] To put things in perspective, the 1989 San Francisco earthquake measured 6.9 on the Richter Scale.
[2] The complete report is available at http://www.doingbusiness.org/Documents/CountryProfiles/HTI.pdf
One prediction for 2010 is that this year will be seen as a defining time for a new industry – the energy finance “industry.” Through the creation of Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) programs, the launch of on-bill financing initiatives, and the development of numerous other types of energy lending offerings, an unprecedented number of new financing options for energy efficiency and alternative energy projects will enter the marketplace.
As I have mentioned previously, most of these new options will by developed and managed by institutions well outside of the formal banking sector. Because most of these new programs involve some type of statutory authorization, more often than not, program design and implementation fall to folks far afield from the financial sector, such as Commerce Commission staff, City Councils, and legislative staff on State Energy Committees.
One consequence is that some basic tenets of lending may not be well articulated in the program designs, statutes, and implementation plans. I will concentrate on four elements that I see as most critical to the energy finance programs and which are often misunderstood:
1. Credit Risk: A fundamental part of any lending program is the borrowers’ capacity and likelihood to repay the debt. In most cases, varying types of borrowers can present different credit risks – a homeowner, for instance, offers very different risk profile than a small business borrower. Groupings that overlook these distinctions can present problems later on as the financing programs attempt to locate the cash needed to fund the loans.
2. Liquidity: Financing programs involve providing cash to pay the upfront costs to install energy saving (or energy producing) measures. The cash has to come from somewhere – ARRA funds, utility borrowings, municipal coffers, banks, CDFIs, the credit markets, etc. In many cases, the initial funds may be quite limited, so the sources of cash are very likely to change as the program scales up. Understanding how these funds are to be obtained throughout the program’s life is a critical feature of the program design. It’s also important to realize that any lending program of notable scale inevitably involves integration with the capital markets – where else will the billions in cash come from?
3. Demand: Even if borrowers with very low risk can be found and cash made available to them at advantageous terms, the targeted borrower still has to elect to borrow the funds (and install the energy saving measures). The notion that attractive capital will inevitably lead to demand for the loan product is highly questionable (see Marrion Fullers’ excellent synopsis of lending programs at http://www.sentech.org/energysummit/documents/3_Fuller_Summary.pdf).
4. Contractor Training and Certification: While financing programs are explicitly about delivering capital in the least costly and most flexible way, providing debt is not the primary purpose of these lending programs – the purpose is to deliver energy savings/production. Without trained and certified contractors and a mechanism for measurement and verification of the expected energy savings/ production, these financing programs cannot achieve their primary objective – even with full repayment of the loans.
Good programs, such as those developed by my colleagues in Portland, AFC First, Renewable Funding, and many others, have these elements front and center in their program design. Hopefully, other new entrants will follow their lead.
January 1, 2010 dawned cold and clear in Chicago, the start of a new year and a new decade. Rarely has a year started with more hope that it will be better than its predecessor. One important survey indicated that Americans are more upbeat about the short-term future than they have been for two years. The economy is recovering from the worst of the recession, but there is a big difference between recovering from a cold and recovering from pneumonia – this recovery will be long and uneven. It will be many months before the fear of a serious relapse can be dismissed. This fear may also be prolonged by the opposing trends in the job and housing markets, which are key economic indicators.
In 2009, over four million jobs were lost, on top of over three million lost jobs in 2008. On average, 575,000 American workers filed for unemployment insurance every week last year. However, recent employment data is beginning to show improvement. Only 11,000 jobs were lost in November, and first-time unemployment insurance claims in December were the lowest in more than a year. Still, the economy has to generate 100,000 new jobs each month, just to absorb new entrants to the workforce.
While the employment picture is brightening, housing remains highly problematic. Mortgage delinquency climbed to 9.64% by September 30. The median sales price for an existing home dropped to $172,600, the lowest since 2003, wiping out trillions of dollars of equity. Spending on construction is also down to 2003 levels.
I actually recently sat down to discuss the economic recovery in 2010 with Lisa Leiter at Crain’s Daily Business, which you can view here.
All-in-all, the watchword for 2010 will have to be Patience.
Am I the only one who finds it odd that my friend’s condo door doesn’t have a peephole? I do not want to have to look out a side window to identify the solicitor at my door. But, isn’t that exactly how giving through social media feels? Now, don’t get me wrong, I think it is great that the internet has revolutionized and accelerated online giving. The Red Cross has thus far raised over $21 million in $10 text donations for Haiti (and I hope there is more to come!); all nonprofits raised $4 million in the entirety of 2009. But, a reported 4,000 scam sites, disguised as nonprofit relief organizations, arose to take a cut of online donations to Hurricane Katrina. Social media makes it easy to give and hard to identity fakes. With Americans having already donated $150 million online (out of the total $300 million) to Haiti, I don’t want to see this giving trend mitigated by fear of cons. Here are a few social media reminders that will help.
Beware of geeks bearing gifts. Just because you have been invited to use a Facebook application or have received a link from a friend doesn’t mean you have to open it! More than once I have received an email from a friend that warns not to click any link from previous emails because of its malicious intent. If something looks odd, it is better to get confirmation from your friend that she is the sender rather than to just open the link.
Haiti is not some far away place to me. Both my parents are from Haiti and I have family members that still live there. I try to go to Haiti every 2 to 3 years and last visited in 2007 to volunteer with a local organization called Concerned Haitian Americans of Illinois (CHAI). I have seen a mix of improving and deteriorating conditions in the country over the past 10 years, but this recent crisis is a wake up call.
In addition, the average Haitian, no different than most, needs to be gainfully employed in order to provide for his or her family and businesses need either debt or savings to get off the ground. But with the unemployment rate hovering around 50% for the last two decades, gainful employment will require greater foreign direct investment and a growing economy. A long-term solution requires investment in both the country’s physical infrastructure (e.g., roads, ports, and telecommunications) and its social infrastructure (e.g., improved school system, reform of a standing army or national police force, and protection of property rights). Without this investment and the ability to provide access to credit, Haiti will continue to be mired in poverty.
One prediction for 2010 is that this year will be seen as a defining time for a new industry – the energy finance “industry.” Through the creation of Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) programs, the launch of on-bill financing initiatives, and the development of numerous other types of energy lending offerings, an unprecedented number of new financing options for energy efficiency and alternative energy projects will enter the marketplace. 
4. Contractor Training and Certification: While financing programs are explicitly about delivering capital in the least costly and most flexible way, providing debt is not the primary purpose of these lending programs – the purpose is to deliver energy savings/production. Without trained and certified contractors and a mechanism for measurement and verification of the expected energy savings/ production, these financing programs cannot achieve their primary objective – even with full repayment of the loans.
January 1, 2010 dawned cold and clear in Chicago, the start of a new year and a new decade. Rarely has a year started with more hope that it will be better than its predecessor. One important survey indicated that Americans are more upbeat about the short-term future than they have been for two years. The economy is recovering from the worst of the recession, but there is a big difference between recovering from a cold and recovering from pneumonia – this recovery will be long and uneven. It will be many months before the fear of a serious relapse can be dismissed. This fear may also be prolonged by the opposing trends in the job and housing markets, which are key economic indicators.
In 2009, over four million jobs were lost, on top of over three million lost jobs in 2008. On average, 575,000 American workers filed for unemployment insurance every week last year. However, recent employment data is beginning to show improvement. Only 11,000 jobs were lost in November, and first-time unemployment insurance claims in December were the lowest in more than a year. Still, the economy has to generate 100,000 new jobs each month, just to absorb new entrants to the workforce.